Expanded Overview of Canada's Refugee & Humanitarian Programs

 

Canada’s refugee system provides protection and resettlement opportunities for individuals fleeing persecution, war, or violence. Below is a detailed breakdown of key programs supporting refugee integration.

​

1. Government-Assisted Refugees (GARs)

 

✔ UNHCR & Designated Organization Referrals – GARs are selected based on vulnerability and urgent need for resettlement.

✔ Financial & Settlement Support – The Canadian government provides housing, healthcare, and basic necessities for up to one year.

✔ Integration Assistance – Settlement agencies offer language training, employment support, and cultural orientation.

✔ No Private Sponsorship Required – Unlike PSRs, GARs are fully managed by government programs, ensuring structured resettlement.

 

GARs receive comprehensive support, ensuring successful integration into Canadian society.

 

2. Privately Sponsored Refugees (PSRs)

 

✔ Community-Led Sponsorship – Private groups, including faith-based organizations and individuals, support refugee resettlement.

✔ Financial & Emotional Support – Sponsors commit to providing resources for one year, ensuring stability.

✔ Expanded Resettlement Capacity – PSRs allow communities to welcome refugees beyond government quotas, strengthening local engagement.

✔ Sponsor-Selected Refugees – Unlike GARs, PSRs are chosen by their sponsors, ensuring personalized support.

 

PSRs foster community-driven refugee integration, ensuring strong local connections.

 

3. In-Canada Asylum Program

 

✔ Border & In-Country Applications – Asylum seekers apply for refugee status upon arrival or from within Canada.

✔ Immigration & Refugee Board (IRB) Assessment – Claims are reviewed based on fear of persecution due to race, religion, nationality, political opinion, or social group membership.

✔ Protected Person Status – Approved applicants receive legal protection, allowing them to apply for permanent residency.

✔ Appeal & Judicial Review Options – Denied claims may be challenged through the Refugee Appeal Division (RAD) or Federal Court review.

 

The asylum program ensures fair refugee protection, supporting individuals facing persecution.

 

4. Refugee & Humanitarian Resettlement Program

 

✔ Convention Refugee Abroad Class – Refugees outside Canada are selected based on Geneva Convention criteria.

✔ Economic Mobility Pathways Pilot (EMPP) – Supports skilled refugees in securing employment-based immigration routes.

✔ Resettlement Assistance Program (RAP) – Provides temporary financial aid and essential services for newly arrived refugees. ✔ Safe Third Country Agreement Considerations – Limits asylum claims from individuals arriving via designated safe countries.

 

These programs ensure structured refugee resettlement, supporting long-term integration.

​

Legal Protections for Refugees & Asylum Seekers

 

✔ Protected Person Status – Refugees granted protection receive legal rights, allowing them to apply for permanent residency.

✔ Refugee Appeal Division (RAD) Rights – Denied asylum seekers can submit appeals to the RAD, ensuring case review.

✔ Safe Third Country Agreement (STCA) Impact – Refugees arriving from a designated safe country may be ineligible to apply.

✔ Judicial Review Mechanisms – Asylum claimants can challenge immigration rulings in Federal Court.

 

These safeguards ensure fair assessments, supporting individuals at risk.

​

Humanitarian Assistance & Resettlement Support

 

✔ Resettlement Assistance Program (RAP) – Provides temporary financial aid, helping newly arrived refugees secure housing.

✔ Employment & Language Training – Specialized programs support refugees in gaining work experience and learning English/French.

✔ Health Coverage & Social Services – Refugees receive healthcare support through Canada’s Interim Federal Health Program (IFHP).

✔ Community Sponsorship Expansion – Initiatives encourage local businesses and organizations to help newcomers integrate.

 

These programs promote long-term settlement success.

​

Emerging Challenges & Policy Adaptations

 

✔ Increased Global Displacement – Canada continues adjusting refugee quotas due to rising international humanitarian crises.

✔ Digitization of Refugee Applications – Processing now includes AI-based screening tools, reducing delays.

✔ Expanded Refugee Employment Opportunities – Economic Mobility Pathways Pilot (EMPP) facilitates job-driven immigration routes for skilled refugees.

✔ New Regional Resettlement Strategies – Immigration policies enhance rural & urban refugee distribution, easing infrastructure demands.

 

Policy updates ensure responsive humanitarian support.

​

Refugee Integration & Community Engagement

 

✔ Local Support Networks – Community-led initiatives help refugees adjust to Canadian society, fostering social inclusion.

✔ Cultural Orientation Programs – Newcomers receive guidance on Canadian laws, customs, and workplace expectations.

✔ Educational Access for Refugee Children – Schools provide specialized learning programs, ensuring smooth academic transitions.

✔ Mental Health & Trauma Support – Counseling services assist refugees in overcoming psychological challenges from displacement.

 

These strategies ensure holistic refugee integration, strengthening community ties.

​

​

​Canada’s refugee system is designed to provide protection, resettlement, and legal pathways for individuals fleeing persecution, war, or violence. Below is a deeper exploration of policy frameworks, integration strategies, and emerging challenges.

​

1. Refugee Status Determination & Legal Protections

 

✔ Eligibility Assessment – Refugee claims are evaluated based on risk of persecution, torture, or cruel treatment in the applicant’s home country.

✔ Protected Person Status – Individuals granted refugee protection receive legal rights, allowing them to apply for permanent residency.

✔ Appeal & Review Mechanisms – Denied asylum seekers can submit appeals, ensuring case reconsideration.

✔ Safe Third Country Agreement (STCA) Considerations – Refugees arriving from designated safe countries may face restrictions on asylum claims.

​

These safeguards ensure fair assessments, supporting individuals at risk.

​

2. Humanitarian Assistance & Resettlement Support

 

✔ Resettlement Assistance Program (RAP) – Provides temporary financial aid, helping newly arrived refugees secure housing and basic necessities.

✔ Employment & Language Training – Specialized programs support refugees in gaining work experience and learning English/French.

✔ Health Coverage & Social Services – Refugees receive healthcare support through Canada’s Interim Federal Health Program (IFHP).

✔ Community Sponsorship Expansion – Initiatives encourage local businesses and organizations to help newcomers integrate.

 

These programs promote long-term settlement success.

​

3. Emerging Challenges & Policy Adaptations

 

✔ Increased Global Displacement – Canada continues adjusting refugee quotas due to rising international humanitarian crises.

✔ Digitization of Refugee Applications – Processing now includes AI-based screening tools, reducing delays and improving efficiency.

✔ Expanded Refugee Employment Opportunities – Economic Mobility Pathways Pilot (EMPP) facilitates job-driven immigration routes for skilled refugees.

✔ New Regional Resettlement Strategies – Immigration policies enhance rural & urban refugee distribution, easing infrastructure demands.

 

Policy updates ensure responsive humanitarian support.

​

4. Refugee Integration & Community Engagement

 

✔ Local Support Networks – Community-led initiatives help refugees adjust to Canadian society, fostering social inclusion.

✔ Cultural Orientation Programs – Newcomers receive guidance on Canadian laws, customs, and workplace expectations.

✔ Educational Access for Refugee Children – Schools provide specialized learning programs, ensuring smooth academic transitions.

✔ Mental Health & Trauma Support – Counseling services assist refugees in overcoming psychological challenges from displacement.

 

These strategies ensure holistic refugee integration, strengthening community ties.

​

​

Policy Shifts in Refugee Resettlement

Canada’s refugee policies are continuously evolving to adapt to global crises and migration trends. Here’s what’s been shaping the future of resettlement:

 

✔ Expanded Private Sponsorship Models – New initiatives allow businesses and nonprofits to take an active role in resettlement. ✔ Regional Resettlement Pilot Programs – Cities with lower population density receive targeted refugee allocations to ensure economic balance.

✔ Digital Immigration Processing – AI-assisted screening tools have accelerated application turnaround times, reducing backlogs. ✔ Cross-Government Collaboration – Provinces now have greater autonomy in selecting refugee candidates based on local workforce needs.

 

These policy trends help optimize resettlement efficiency while enhancing integration opportunities.

 

Challenges Facing Canada’s Refugee System

 

✔ Housing Shortages in Urban Centers – High demand in major cities has led to policy discussions on rural refugee placements. ✔ Healthcare Accessibility for Newcomers – Expanding Canada’s healthcare framework to accommodate trauma-related needs for refugees.

✔ Employment Gaps & Workforce Integration – Addressing barriers that prevent refugees from accessing skilled professions aligned with their experience.

✔ Asylum Processing Delays – Rising global conflicts have increased caseload volume, requiring faster adjudication methods.

 

Understanding these challenges allows policymakers to refine refugee support systems for improved outcomes.

​

​

New Refugee Integration Strategies

​

✔ Employer-Based Sponsorships – Encouraging corporate-backed refugee resettlement initiatives that provide direct job placements.

✔ Rural Revitalization Programs – Incentives for refugees to settle in smaller towns, supporting local business growth.

✔ Cultural Mentorship Networks – Pairing refugees with experienced newcomers who provide guidance on adjusting to Canadian life.

✔ Education Access for Refugee Youth – Specialized school programs designed to support academic success through tutoring and cultural adaptation.

 

These strategies foster self-sufficiency and strong community ties, ensuring refugees can thrive long-term.

​

X (Re), 2018 CanLII 52123 (CA IRB), Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada
In the case of X (Re), 2018 CanLII 52123 (CA IRB),

 

the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada (IRB) examined an application for refugee protection from an individual who alleged a well-founded fear of persecution based on their sexual orientation. The claimant asserted that
they faced severe discrimination, threats, and violence in their home country due to their identity

as a member of the LGBTQ+ community. During the hearing, the IRB considered the claimant's
personal testimony along with the broader sociopolitical context, including the legal and social
conditions affecting LGBTQ+ individuals in the claimant's country of origin.
The IRB ultimately granted refugee status, finding the claimant's testimony credible and
corroborated by international reports indicating an alarming level of discrimination and violence
towards LGBTQ+ individuals in their home country. The decision underscored the importance of
considering personal narratives alongside contextual evidence when assessing claims of
persecution. This ruling not only affirmed the claimant's need for protection in Canada but also
highlighted the IRB's sensitivity to issues of sexual orientation and the risks faced by
marginalized communities globally.

​

X (Re), 2015 CanLII 19235 (CA IRB), Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada

In the case of X (Re), 2015 CanLII 19235 (CA IRB), the Immigration and Refugee Board of
Canada (IRB) addressed a refugee claim made by an individual from a country experiencing
significant political instability. The applicant asserted that they had a well-founded fear of
persecution due to their political beliefs and opposition to the ruling government. This fear was
underscored by the applicant's personal experiences of harassment and intimidation by state
agents linked to their political activism. The case involved evaluating the credibility of the
applicant's account, as well as contextual evidence regarding the political situation in the home
country.

​

The IRB ultimately granted the applicant refugee status, concluding that the evidence provided
sufficiently demonstrated a risk of persecution based on the applicant's political opinions. The
Board emphasized the importance of assessing individual narratives in conjunction with country
conditions that reveal systemic patterns of violence and repression against dissenters. The
decision highlighted the IRB's commitment to protecting vulnerable individuals facing
persecution, reflecting a nuanced understanding of the complexities surrounding political asylum
claims.

​

Keba v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2012 CanLII 86209 (CA IRB), Immigration and
Refugee Board of Canada

In the case of Keba v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2012 CanLII 86209 (CA IRB), the
Immigration and Refugee Board (IRB) addressed the refugee claim of Mr. Keba, who sought
protection in Canada based on the fear of persecution due to his sexual orientation as a member
of the LGBTQ+ community in his home country. Mr. Keba testified that he faced significant
dangers and violence due to his identity and that the legal framework in his country offered no
protection against such persecution. He detailed instances of harassment and threats he
experienced, substantiating his claim with personal accounts of his struggles and the societal
attitudes towards LGBTQ+ individuals in his homeland.
The IRB's adjudication focused on assessing the credibility of Mr. Keba's claims and the extent
of the danger he faced upon return. The board ultimately granted his application for refugee
status, recognizing that the evidence presented demonstrated a well-founded fear of persecution
based on his sexual orientation. This decision reflected a broader acknowledgment of the risks
faced by individuals in similar positions in countries where LGBTQ+ rights are severely limited
or nonexistent. The case highlights the IRB's commitment to protecting vulnerable populations

and reinforces the principle that states are accountable to uphold the rights of individuals
regardless of their sexual orientation, especially in the context of international protection laws.

​

​

​Gao v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2011 CanLII 48092 (CA IRB), Immigration and
Refugee Board of Canada

In *Gao v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)*, 2011 CanLII 48092 (CA IRB), the
Immigration and Refugee Board (IRB) of Canada assessed the refugee claim of Mr. Gao, a
Chinese national who sought protection on the grounds of a well-founded fear of persecution due
to his political beliefs and activism against the Chinese government. Mr. Gao testified about his
involvement in pro-democracy protests and described instances of surveillance, detention, and
harassment by Chinese authorities, which heightened his fear of returning to China. He argued
that the Chinese government's history of repressing dissenters posed a significant risk to his
safety.

The IRB focused on evaluating the credibility of Mr. Gao's claims in conjunction with the
political climate in China, particularly regarding the treatment of individuals who oppose the
regime. The board considered various evidence, including country condition reports and
testimonies regarding the dangers faced by political dissidents. Ultimately, the IRB concluded
that Mr. Gao had established a credible risk of persecution if he were to return to China, leading
to the decision to grant him refugee status. This case underlines the IRB's role in protecting
individuals fleeing state-sponsored violence and emphasizes the importance of providing asylum
to those in danger due to their political opinions or activism.

​

Tabesh v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2004 CanLII 76104 (CA IRB), Immigration and
Refugee Board of Canada

In *Tabesh v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)*, 2004 CanLII 76104 (CA IRB), the
Immigration and Refugee Board (IRB) evaluated the refugee claim of Mr. Tabesh, an Iranian
national who sought asylum in Canada based on his fear of persecution related to his political
activities and beliefs. Mr. Tabesh testified that he had been involved with a political organization
opposing the Iranian government, which led to his targeted harassment, threats, and detention by
authorities in Iran. He provided detailed accounts of his experiences, claiming that his life would
be in jeopardy if he were forced to return to Iran.

The IRB considered the evidence presented, including Mr. Tabesh's personal narrative,
corroborating documents, and reports on the political situation in Iran. The board assessed the
general risks associated with political dissent in Iran, particularly the government's hostility
toward activists and opposition groups. Ultimately, the IRB determined that Mr. Tabesh
demonstrated a well-founded fear of persecution due to his political involvement. As a result, the
board granted him refugee status, reinforcing its commitment to protecting individuals facing

severe threats to their safety due to their political beliefs and actions. This case highlights the
IRB's role in upholding human rights and providing refuge to those fleeing oppressive regimes.

​

X (Re), 2017 CanLII 142905 (CA IRB), Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada
 

In *X (Re)*, 2017 CanLII 142905 (CA IRB), the Immigration and Refugee Board (IRB)
examined the asylum claim of an unnamed individual who sought protection in Canada due to a
well-founded fear of persecution in their home country. The claimant presented evidence of
being a member of a marginalized group that faced systemic discrimination and violence. During
the hearing, the claimant detailed several incidents that illustrated the dangers they encountered,
including threats and physical harm due to their identity. The IRB was tasked with analyzing the
credibility of the claimant's accounts in the context of the prevailing conditions in their home
country.

The IRB carefully assessed various facets of the case, including country condition reports, expert
testimonies, and the overall risk of persecution faced by the claimant’s community. Additionally,
the board scrutinized the claimant’s personal narrative for consistency and plausibility.
Ultimately, the IRB concluded that the evidence presented sufficiently demonstrated a real and
personal risk of persecution if the claimant were to return to their home country. As a result, the
board granted the individual refugee status, affirming its commitment to protecting those fleeing
persecution based on their identity or social affiliations. This verdict underscores the IRB's role
in safeguarding the rights of vulnerable populations seeking asylum in Canada.

​

Shareef v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2011 CanLII 63170 (CA IRB), Immigration
and Refugee Board of Canada

 

In *Shareef v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)*, 2011 CanLII 63170 (CA IRB), the
Immigration and Refugee Board (IRB) addressed the claim for refugee protection filed by Mr.
Shareef, a citizen of Somalia. Mr. Shareef contended that he faced a well-founded fear of
persecution due to his clan affiliation and political opinions. Specifically, he asserted that he was
targeted by armed groups and government authorities because of his perceived critical stance
against the Somali government, which had resulted in threats to his safety and life.

The IRB undertook a thorough examination of Mr. Shareef's testimony and the broader security
context in Somalia, which is marred by instability and violence stemming from ongoing conflicts
among various factions. The board assessed the credibility of his claims against the backdrop of
country condition reports that indicated the dangers faced by individuals with dissenting views in
Somalia. Ultimately, the IRB found Mr. Shareef's concerns to be credible, concluding that he
indeed faced significant risks of persecution based on his clan position and political expression.
As a result, the board granted him refugee status, reflecting its commitment to providing
protection for individuals fleeing dangerous conditions in their home countries.

​​

X (Re), 2013 CanLII 82622 (CA IRB), Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada

In *X (Re)*, 2013 CanLII 82622 (CA IRB), the Immigration and Refugee Board (IRB)
considered the refugee claim of an individual whose identity was kept confidential due to the
sensitive nature of the case. The claimant, from a country characterized by widespread violence
and human rights abuses, alleged a well-founded fear of persecution based on their political
opinions and affiliation with a particular social group. During the hearing, the individual
provided evidence of threats and harassment that they had experienced due to their activism and
membership in an organization advocating for political change.

The IRB evaluated the credibility of the claimant's testimony and the accompanying
documentation, including country condition reports that highlighted the dangers faced by
individuals opposing the ruling regime. The board's decision emphasized the need to protect
individuals from persecution based on their political beliefs, particularly in contexts where
dissent leads to oppression and violence. Ultimately, the IRB concluded that the claimant’s fears
were well-founded, taking into account the overall climate of fear and repression in their home
country. The board granted refugee status, reaffirming its mandate to protect those at risk of
persecution and reinforce Canada’s commitment to providing refuge to vulnerable individuals.

​

Han v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2008 CanLII 76567 (CA IRB), Immigration and
Refugee Board of Canada

In *Han v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)*, 2008 CanLII 76567 (CA IRB), the
Immigration and Refugee Board (IRB) addressed the refugee claim of Mr. Han, a Chinese
national who sought protection in Canada on the basis of his political opinions and prior
experiences of persecution in China. Mr. Han alleged that he faced harassment and detention by
Chinese authorities due to his involvement in pro-democracy activities and his efforts to promote
free speech. He detailed instances of mistreatment, including arbitrary detention and
intimidation, which he claimed were directly related to his political beliefs and activism against
the Chinese government.

The IRB conducted a thorough examination of Mr. Han's claims, analyzing the credibility of his
testimony and the pertinent country condition reports highlighting the oppressive political
atmosphere in China. Despite some inconsistencies in his account, the board acknowledged the
systematic persecution of activists in the country and recognized the overall context of
suppression faced by individuals expressing dissent against the Chinese regime. Ultimately, the
IRB concluded that Mr. Han's fear of persecution was well-founded and granted him refugee
status, reinforcing Canada’s commitment to protecting individuals at risk of harm due to their
political beliefs and activities.

​

X (Re), 2013 CanLII 67015 (CA IRB), Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada

In the case of *X (Re)*, 2013 CanLII 67015 (CA IRB), the Immigration and Refugee Board
(IRB) assessed an individual's claim for refugee protection based on fears of persecution due to
political opinion and risk of harm if returned to their home country, characterized by a history of
widespread human rights violations. The claimant, whose identity is protected for privacy
reasons, detailed incidents of intimidation, threats, and violence they experienced as a result of
their political activities. The individual argued that their involvement in anti-government protests
and promotion of free expression made them a target for state-sponsored persecution.

The IRB rigorously examined the evidence presented by the claimant, including personal
testimonies, corroborating documents, and relevant country condition reports that depicted the
risks faced by dissenters in the claimant's home country. Despite some inconsistencies in the
testimony, the IRB ultimately found the context of political repression compelling. The board
determined that the claimant had a well-founded fear of persecution if returned to their home
country and granted them refugee status. This decision underscored the IRB's commitment to
protecting individuals who face significant threats to their safety and freedom based on their
political beliefs.

​

Brar v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2008 CanLII 76505 (CA IRB), Immigration and
Refugee Board of Canada

In the case of *Brar v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)*, 2008 CanLII 76505 (CA IRB),
the Immigration and Refugee Board (IRB) examined the refugee claim of Mr. Brar, a citizen of
India who sought protection in Canada due to a well-founded fear of persecution based on his
political beliefs and ethnic background. Mr. Brar argued that he had been targeted by government
authorities and other groups due to his activism for Sikh rights and his opposition to the Indian
government's policies towards Sikhs. He provided accounts of threats, harassment, and police
action against him, asserting that his life would be in jeopardy if he were to return to India.

The IRB conducted a thorough assessment of Mr. Brar's claims, considering various factors,
including the credibility of his testimony, the consistency of his statements, and corroborating
evidence regarding the treatment of Sikhs in India. While the IRB found some inconsistencies in
Mr. Brar's account, it acknowledged the broader context of political repression and violence
against minorities in India. Ultimately, the board concluded that Mr. Brar faced a significant risk
of persecution and danger if returned to India, and granted him refugee status. This decision
illustrated the IRB's commitment to protecting individuals facing persecution based on their
political and ethnic identities.

​

Tan v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 CanLII 31994 (CA IRB), Immigration and
Refugee Board of Canada

​

In the case of *Tan v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)*, 2017 CanLII 31994 (CA IRB),
the Immigration and Refugee Board (IRB) reviewed the refugee claim of Mr. Tan, a citizen of
China who sought protection in Canada on the grounds of fear of persecution based on his
political beliefs and association with a banned religious group. Mr. Tan contended that due to his
involvement in underground Christian activities, he faced heightened scrutiny and risks of
harassment from Chinese authorities. He provided detailed accounts of surveillance,
intimidation, and aggressive tactics used by the police targeting practitioners of his faith,
asserting that his life would be endangered if he returned to China.

The IRB carefully examined the evidence presented by Mr. Tan, including his personal
testimony, the consistency of his statements, and relevant reports on religious freedom and
human rights conditions in China. While there were some inconsistencies in Mr. Tan’s narrative
regarding his experiences, the IRB ultimately determined that the broader context of religious
persecution in China warranted his claim. The board concluded that Mr. Tan had a well-founded
fear of persecution due to his religious beliefs and granted him refugee status. This decision
reaffirmed the IRB’s role in safeguarding individuals facing significant risks due to their
religious practices and political views.

​

Andrew v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2014 CanLII 95466 (CA IRB), Immigration
and Refugee Board of Canada

In the case of *Andrew v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)*, 2014 CanLII 95466 (CA
IRB), the Immigration and Refugee Board (IRB) assessed the refugee claim of Mr. Andrew, a
national of Jamaica who sought protection in Canada based on his fear of persecution due to his
sexual orientation. Mr. Andrew reported that he had been targeted by both state authorities and
non-state actors due to his identification as a gay man in Jamaica, a country noted for its
widespread intolerance and violence against the LGBTQ+ community. He detailed various
incidents of homophobic violence and harassment he experienced, asserting that he would face
severe harm if returned to Jamaica.

The IRB evaluated Mr. Andrew's credibility and the evidence presented in support of his claim,
including the general country conditions regarding LGBTQ+ rights in Jamaica. The board
recognized the systemic discrimination and the prevalent danger that individuals who identify as
LGBTQ+ face in Jamaica, citing numerous reports from human rights organizations that
document the situation. Ultimately, the IRB found that Mr. Andrew had a well-founded fear of
persecution based on his sexual orientation and granted him refugee status in Canada. This ruling
underscored the IRB's commitment to protecting vulnerable individuals from persecution based
on their sexual identity in countries where such identities are criminalized or stigmatized.

​

X (Re), 2016 CanLII 106181 (CA IRB), Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada

​

In the case of *X (Re)*, 2016 CanLII 106181 (CA IRB), the Immigration and Refugee Board
(IRB) examined the refugee claim of an individual, referred to as X, who sought protection in
Canada due to a well-founded fear of persecution in their home country. X claimed that they
faced significant threats related to their sexual identity and gender expression, arguing that the
societal norms and laws in their country were hostile towards individuals like them. X provided
detailed accounts of past incidents of discrimination, harassment, and violence, which were
corroborated by evidence of broader systemic issues faced by LGBTQ+ individuals in their
country.

The IRB assessed the credibility of X's testimony against the backdrop of documented country
conditions regarding human rights and the treatment of LGBTQ+ individuals. Reports indicated
a pervasive culture of intolerance, violence, and legal consequences for those who did not
conform to traditional gender roles or sexual orientations. Ultimately, the IRB concluded that X
had established a well-founded fear of persecution based on their sexual identity and granted
them refugee status in Canada. This decision highlighted the IRB's commitment to protecting
individuals fleeing persecution based on sexual orientation and gender identity, affirming
Canada's obligations under international human rights laws.

​

X (Re), 2013 CanLII 76473 (CA IRB), Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada

In the case of *X (Re)*, 2013 CanLII 76473 (CA IRB), the Immigration and Refugee Board
(IRB) considered the refugee claim of an individual identified as X, who sought asylum in
Canada due to a well-founded fear of persecution based on their sexual orientation. X, a national
from a country known for its hostility towards LGBTQ+ individuals, testified about experiences
of harassment, violence, and discrimination that they faced throughout their life, including
threats from family members and societal rejection. Their claim was supported by both personal
testimony and broader evidence indicating the significant risks faced by LGBTQ+ individuals in
their home country.

The IRB conducted a thorough review of the evidence provided, which included reports from
human rights organizations outlining the dangers posed to LGBTQ+ individuals, such as
violence, legal repercussions, and social ostracism. The Board assessed X's credibility and the
consistency of their testimony with documented country conditions. Ultimately, the IRB
determined that X had a legitimate fear of persecution if returned to their home country and
consequently granted them refugee status in Canada. This decision reaffirmed Canada’s
commitment to upholding the rights of individuals facing persecution due to their sexual
orientation, emphasizing the importance of international protection for vulnerable populations.

​

X (Re), 2015 CanLII 111326 (CA IRB), Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada

In *X (Re)*, 2015 CanLII 111326 (CA IRB), the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada
(IRB) evaluated the refugee claim of an individual known as X, who sought asylum based on a

well-founded fear of persecution due to their sexual orientation and gender identity. X provided
compelling testimony detailing past experiences of harassment, violence, and discrimination in
their home country, emphasizing the serious threats faced by LGBTQ+ individuals. The
claimant's narrative was supported by evidence from various human rights organizations that
documented systemic violence and discrimination against LGBTQ+ people in their country of
origin.

The IRB conducted a thorough assessment of X's credibility and the broader country conditions
that impacted LGBTQ+ individuals. Given the substantial evidence of ongoing persecution and
social hostility in X's home country, the IRB determined that returning X would expose them to a
significant risk of harm. As a result, the Board granted refugee status, highlighting Canada's
commitment to protecting individuals who face persecution based on sexual orientation and
reinforcing the importance of providing safe refuge for marginalized communities.

​

X (Re), 2013 CanLII 76397 (CA IRB), Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada

In *X (Re)*, 2013 CanLII 76397 (CA IRB), the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada
(IRB) considered the refugee claim of an individual whose application was based on fears of
persecution related to their political opinion. The claimant, who had been involved in activism
and opposing the government in their home country, recounted specific instances of harassment,
threats, and violence from government authorities and loyalists due to their political activities.
The claim was substantiated with supporting evidence, including reports from human rights
organizations that highlighted the oppressive environment for political dissenters in the
claimant’s country.

The IRB carefully examined the claimant’s credibility, considering the consistency of their
testimony and the corroborative documents presented. The Board also addressed the broader
country conditions affecting political dissidents, noting a pattern of repression and the significant
risks involved for individuals opposing the ruling government. Ultimately, the IRB found that the
claimant had established a well-founded fear of persecution if returned to their home country.
Consequently, the Board granted refugee status, reaffirming Canada's commitment to protecting
individuals facing persecution due to their political beliefs and activism.

​

X (Re), 2015 CanLII 30384 (CA IRB), Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada

In *X (Re)*, 2015 CanLII 30384 (CA IRB), the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada
(IRB) assessed the refugee claim of an individual—referred to as X—who sought protection on
the grounds of persecution due to their membership in a particular social group, specifically
related to their sexual orientation. The claimant articulated a history of severe discrimination,
violence, and threats in their home country directed at LGBTQ+ individuals, supported by
personal testimonies recounting traumatic experiences. X submitted that their life would be at

serious risk if returned to their home country due to societal stigma and the legal environment
that criminalizes homosexuality.

The IRB evaluated the credibility of X's claims through the examination of their personal
narrative, corroborating evidence from reputable human rights organizations, and the country
conditions relevant to LGBTQ+ rights. With substantial evidence demonstrating a pervasive
threat to the safety and dignity of individuals identifying as LGBTQ+ in X's home country, the
Board concluded that the claimant had a well-founded fear of persecution. Consequently, the
IRB decided to grant refugee status to X, underscoring Canada's obligation to provide protection
to those facing systemic discrimination and violence based on their sexual orientation. This case
highlights the Board's commitment to safeguarding the rights of vulnerable populations in the
context of international human rights standards.

​

X (Re), 2016 CanLII 105374 (CA IRB), Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada

In *X (Re)*, 2016 CanLII 105374 (CA IRB), the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada
(IRB) heard the case of an individual seeking refugee status based on their fear of persecution
due to their political opinion. The claimant, whose political activism had drawn the attention of
government authorities, presented evidence of threats and intimidation that they experienced as a
result of their involvement in opposition politics. The IRB conducted a thorough evaluation of
the claimant's testimony, emphasizing the significance of the political climate in their home
country, where dissenting voices faced violent reprisals and systematic suppression.

Throughout the proceedings, the IRB assessed the consistency and credibility of the claimant's
account alongside the broader context of state-sponsored persecution against political dissidents.
The Board considered corroborative evidence, including reports from human rights organizations
that documented the systemic targeting of activists. After careful consideration of all evidence
and the risks posed by returning the claimant to their home country, the IRB determined that the
individual had a well-founded fear of persecution. Consequently, the Board granted refugee
status, reaffirming Canada’s commitment to providing protection for individuals who face
persecution due to their political beliefs and involvement in activism.

​

X (Re), 2013 CanLII 76390 (CA IRB), Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada

In *X (Re)*, 2013 CanLII 76390 (CA IRB), the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada
(IRB) reviewed the refugee claim of an individual who sought protection on the grounds of
persecution based on their sexual orientation. The claimant reported experiencing severe
discrimination, threats, and violence in their home country due to being openly gay. They
provided a detailed account of specific incidents, including assaults and rejection from family
and community, which underscored their fear of returning to a socio-political environment that
criminalizes homosexuality and fosters hostility toward LGBTQ+ individuals.

​

The IRB thoroughly examined the claimant's testimony, weighing it against the backdrop of
country conditions that indicated widespread violence and discrimination against LGBTQ+
persons in the claimant's home country. The Board considered the credibility of the evidence
presented, alongside reports from recognized human rights organizations that highlighted the
risks of persecution faced by individuals based on their sexual orientation. Ultimately, the IRB
concluded that the claimant had a well-founded fear of persecution if returned, granting them
refugee status. This decision underscored Canada's commitment to protecting individuals fleeing
violence and systemic discrimination due to their sexual identity.

​

Diouf v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2011 CanLII 59952 (CA IRB), Immigration and
Refugee Board of Canada

In *Diouf v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2011 CanLII 59952 (CA IRB)*, the
Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada (IRB) assessed the case of a refugee claimant from
Senegal who sought protection based on fears of persecution due to their political opinion and
sexual orientation. The claimant, who identified as gay, argued that their sexual identity made
them vulnerable to severe persecution in Senegal, a country that criminalizes same-sex
relationships and in which individuals identifying as LGBTQ+ face significant societal and
governmental discrimination. The claimant provided testimony about past threats and incidents
of violence related to their sexual orientation and political activism.

The IRB evaluated the credibility of the evidence presented, considering the dire human rights
situation in Senegal regarding LGBTQ+ individuals. The Board reviewed various reports
documenting the high incidence of violence against sexual minorities and the inadequate
protection offered by law enforcement in such cases. After carefully analyzing the circumstances
and evidence, the IRB concluded that the claimant had a well-founded fear of persecution if
returned to Senegal based on both their political beliefs and sexual orientation. Consequently, the
Board granted refugee status, affirming Canada's protective obligations towards individuals
fleeing persecution for their identity and beliefs.

​

X (Re), 2005 CanLII 77801 (CA IRB), Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada

In *X (Re)*, 2005 CanLII 77801 (CA IRB), the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada
(IRB) considered the refugee claim of an individual who sought protection based on their fear of
persecution in their home country due to their sexual orientation. The claimant, who identified as
gay, reported facing significant discrimination, threats, and violence in their home country, which
has laws that criminalize homosexuality and foster an environment of intolerance toward
LGBTQ+ individuals. The testimony included personal experiences of harassment and violence,
which underscored the imminent risk the claimant faced if returned.

The IRB evaluated the evidence and the country conditions that highlighted the systemic risks
faced by LGBTQ+ individuals in the claimant's home country, referencing reports from

international human rights organizations that documented the scope of violence and
discrimination. The Board found the claimant's fears credible and grounded in both personal
experiences and broader societal norms that perpetrated harm against individuals based on their
sexual orientation. As a result, the IRB concluded that the claimant had a well-founded fear of
persecution and granted refugee status, thereby reaffirming the importance of providing asylum
to individuals fleeing persecution based on their sexual identity.

​

### Egharevba v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2013 CanLII 33228 (CA IRB)

 

In **Egharevba v. Canada**, the IRB evaluated the information presented by a Nigerian
national claiming refugee status based on a well-founded fear of persecution due to his
ethnicity and political opinions. The claimant described a history of violence and discrimination
against members of his ethnic group and argued that his political activities opposing the
government could lead to retaliation. The IRB focused on the specific circumstances

surrounding Egharevba's experiences and the broader context of ethnic and political conflicts in
Nigeria.

​

The Board ultimately granted Egharevba's application for refugee protection, recognizing a
credible fear of persecution based on the evidence provided. The IRB concluded that the
systemic risks faced by individuals of the claimant's ethnicity, combined with his political
stance, constituted a well-founded fear of persecution. The decision highlighted the importance
of protecting those who are at risk due to their identity and political beliefs, reaffirming the
IRB's commitment to upholding human rights in the context of refugee claims.

​

### Deschamp v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2009 CanLII 76284 (CA
IRB)

​

In **Deschamp v. Canada**, the IRB reviewed the refugee claim of a man from Haiti who
alleged persecution due to his political activism and involvement with opposition groups.
Deschamp presented evidence of threats and violence directed at him based on his political
views, arguing that returning to Haiti would expose him to further harm. The IRB carefully
analyzed the applicant’s testimony and the prevailing conditions in Haiti regarding political
dissent.

​

Ultimately, the Board ruled in favor of Deschamp, granting him refugee status on the grounds
of a well-founded fear of persecution. The IRB found that the evidence presented convincingly
demonstrated the risk associated with his political activities and the systematic repression of
dissent in Haiti. The decision underscored the necessity of protecting individuals who face
genuine risks of persecution based on their political beliefs, highlighting the IRB's role in
evaluating claims within the context of human rights.

​

### Keays v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 CanLII 54764 (CA IRB)

​

In **Keays v. Canada**, the IRB reviewed a refugee claim from an individual who fled from a
country experiencing ongoing political turmoil and violence against dissidents. The claimant
argued that they faced targeted persecution due to their opposition to the government and had
experienced direct threats as a result of their political activities. The IRB assessed the
applicant’s story in conjunction with the overall human rights situation in their home country,
taking into account the treatment of political activists.

​

The Board granted Keays’s application for refugee protection, finding that the evidence
established a credible fear of persecution based on the applicant's political stance. The IRB
recognized the systematic violence and repression faced by dissenters in the claimant's country,
determining that returning them would pose a significant threat to their safety. The ruling
underscored the importance of recognizing individual risks associated with political activism
and the need for international protection for those in vulnerable situations.

​

### Kaur v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2011 CanLII 90930 (CA IRB)

In **Kaur v. Canada**, the IRB examined the refugee claim of a woman from India who
asserted that her life would be in jeopardy due to her involvement in activism supporting
women's rights. Kaur claimed that she faced threats and violence stemming from her efforts to
advocate for gender equality in a challenging political and social context. The Board analyzed
the credibility of her narrative along with the broader realities of women's rights in India.

 

The IRB ultimately granted Kaur's application for refugee protection, recognizing the evidence
provided as establishing a well-founded fear of persecution based on her gender and activism.
The Board determined that returning her to India would expose her to significant danger and
that the systemic oppression faced by women advocating for their rights lent credence to her

fears. This decision highlighted the importance of addressing gender-based persecution in
refugee claims and affirmed the IRB's commitment to protecting vulnerable individuals.

​​

### Lupo v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2009 CanLII 84684 (CA IRB)

​

In **Lupo v. Canada**, the IRB evaluated the refugee claim of an Ecuadorian individual, who
asserted he faced persecution due to his political beliefs and activism against local corruption.

Lupo detailed incidences of threats and violence linked to his work in a community organization
that opposes corrupt practices within the government. The Board carefully analyzed the
credibility of Lupo's claims against the backdrop of Ecuador's political climate and the
treatment of dissenters.

​

The IRB ultimately granted Lupo’s application for refugee protection, recognizing a well-
founded fear of persecution based on his political activities. The evidence highlighted systemic
violence against activists in Ecuador, and the Board concluded that returning Lupo would
jeopardize his safety. This ruling underlined the critical role of the IRB in evaluating the risks
faced by individuals opposing oppressive regimes, demonstrating a commitment to
safeguarding those at risk of persecution.

​

### Aziz v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2008 CanLII 46157 (CA IRB)

​

In **Aziz v. Canada**, the IRB reviewed the refugee claim of an Iranian national who alleged
that he faced persecution based on his sexual orientation and political beliefs. Aziz reported
experiencing violence and harassment within Iran due to his identity and involvement in
LGBTQ+ advocacy, asserting that returning would expose him to severe risks of persecution.
The IRB examined both the individual circumstances of Aziz and the broader context regarding
the treatment of LGBTQ+ individuals in Iran.

​

The Board ultimately granted Aziz’s application for refugee protection, acknowledging the
credible fear of persecution he faced as an openly gay man in Iran. The decision emphasized the
systemic discrimination against LGBTQ+ individuals within the country, highlighting the
importance of recognizing such persecution as a legitimate basis for refugee status. This ruling
reinforced the IRB's commitment to protecting vulnerable populations and ensuring safety for
those fleeing oppression based on their identity.

​

### X (Re), 2004 CanLII 56771 (CA IRB)

​

In **X (Re)**, the IRB addressed a refugee claim from an unnamed individual who alleged
persecution due to their political beliefs in a country experiencing significant political unrest
and human rights violations. The claimant presented evidence of harassment and violence
directed toward individuals with similar political affiliations, arguing that returning home would
place their life at risk. The IRB examined the specifics of the claimant's experiences in relation
to the broader political climate.

​

The Board ultimately granted the application for refugee protection, recognizing a well-founded
fear of persecution based on the credible evidence presented. The ruling emphasized the

importance of understanding the socio-political context in which individuals face risks and the
obligation to protect those fleeing persecution for their political beliefs. This case underscored
the IRB's role in safeguarding human rights and the necessity for thorough assessments of
individual circumstances in claims for asylum.

​

### Siteram v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2008 CanLII 75614 (CA IRB)

 

In **Siteram v. Canada**, the IRB reviewed the case of a national from Guyana claiming
refugee protection due to persecution related to his political beliefs. The claimant asserted that
his outspoken opposition to political corruption had made him a target for violence by political
factions. The IRB evaluated the evidence presented, including documentation of systemic issues
regarding political rights and safety in Guyana, as well as specific details of Siteram’s
experiences.

​

Ultimately, the Board granted Siteram’s application for refugee status, recognizing a credible
fear of persecution based on his political activities. The IRB concluded that the evidence
highlighted the systemic risks faced by dissenters, affirming the need to protect individuals who
risk their safety in advocating for governmental accountability. The decision reflected the
importance of providing refuge to those fleeing oppressive regimes and the Board's
commitment to upholding international human rights standards.

​

### Floriant v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 CanLII 113521 (CA IRB)

​

In **Floriant v. Canada**, the IRB reviewed the refugee claim of a Haitian national who
asserted that he faced persecution due to his political beliefs and activism against corruption in
Haiti. Floriant provided testimony detailing threats and violence directed at him from
government officials and criminal gangs as a result of his opposition to the prevailing
government. During the proceedings, the IRB assessed the credibility of his claims against the
backdrop of the deteriorating political situation in Haiti.

​

The Board ultimately granted Floriant's application for refugee protection, recognizing that the
evidence he presented established a well-founded fear of persecution. The IRB's decision
emphasized the serious risks faced by individuals who speak out against governmental abuses
in Haiti and reflected a commitment to protecting those at risk of political persecution. This
case highlighted the importance of recognizing personal testimonies in the context of broader
human rights conditions.

​

### X (Re), 2018 CanLII 109764 (CA IRB)

​

In **X (Re)**, the IRB considered the refugee claim of an individual asserting persecution based
on their sexual orientation in a country with significant anti-LGBTQ+ sentiments. The claimant
provided personal accounts of violence and discrimination they faced due to their identity,
arguing that returning to their home country would expose them to severe risks. The IRB
evaluated the credibility of the individual’s experiences alongside country reports concerning
the treatment of LGBTQ+ individuals.

​

The Board ultimately granted the application for refugee protection, recognizing a well-founded
fear of persecution based on the credible evidence presented. The IRB's decision underscored
the systematic discrimination and violence faced by LGBTQ+ people in the claimant's home
country, reflecting a growing awareness and commitment to protecting marginalized
communities within the context of Canadian asylum law.

​

### X (Re), 2014 CanLII 94250 (CA IRB)

 

In **X (Re)**, the IRB assessed a refugee claim from an individual alleging persecution based on
their political beliefs in a region experiencing significant civil unrest. The claimant described
threats and harassment linked to their opposition to government policies, stating that returning
would place them at considerable risk. The IRB examined both the personal narrative and
broader reports detailing the political atmosphere in the individual's home country.

​

The Board granted the claim for refugee protection, concluding that the evidence substantiated
a well-founded fear of persecution. The IRB emphasized the importance of assessing claims
within the context of heightened political tensions and the risks faced by dissenting voices. This
decision illustrated the IRB's commitment to providing protection for individuals at risk due to
political persecution.

​

### Wu v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2010 CanLII 96519 (CA IRB)

​

In **Wu v. Canada**, the IRB evaluated the refugee claim of a Chinese national who alleged
persecution due to his religious beliefs and practices. Wu contended that he faced threats from
government authorities because of his participation in an unregistered church. The IRB
examined the applicant's testimony, along with country conditions regarding religious freedom
in China, which included significant government control over religious practices.

​

The Board ultimately ruled in favor of Wu, granting him refugee protection based on a credible
fear of persecution due to his religious beliefs. The IRB recognized the systematic repression
faced by individuals practicing religions that are not sanctioned by the state, affirming the
necessity of asylum for those fleeing such conditions. This case illustrated the critical role that
religious freedom plays in determining refugee eligibility.

​

### Mahajan v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2011 CanLII 89852 (CA IRB)

In **Mahajan v. Canada**, the IRB investigated the refugee claim of an Indian national who
alleged persecution based on his political activities and activism for minority rights. Mahajan
described experiences of intimidation and violence connected to his involvement in protests
and advocacy for equitable treatment for marginalized groups. The IRB considered both his
testimonies and the prevailing conditions regarding human rights in India.

​

The Board ultimately granted Mahajan’s application for refugee status, recognizing a credible
fear of persecution based on the evidence presented. The IRB concluded that the risks
associated with political dissent and the specific threats to minority advocates in India
warranted protection. This decision underscored the importance of safeguarding individuals
who advocate for human rights in hostile environments.

​

### Gabriel v Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2018 CanLII 26590 (CA IRB)

 

In **Gabriel v. Canada**, the IRB reviewed the refugee claim of a Haitian national alleging
persecution due to his political activism against corruption in Haiti. Gabriel claimed that he
faced threats from both the authorities and gang members as a result of his outspoken
criticisms of the government. The IRB examined the credibility of his testimony and the broader
context of political violence in Haiti.

​

Ultimately, the Board granted Gabriel's application for refugee protection, identifying a well-
founded fear of persecution based on the credible evidence of systemic threats against political
activists in Haiti. The IRB's decision highlighted the need to protect individuals facing
persecution for their political beliefs and reaffirmed Canada’s commitment to human rights and
refugee protection.

​

### Asif v Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2018 CanLII 131198 (CA IRB)

 

In **Asif v. Canada**, the IRB reviewed the refugee claim by a national from Pakistan who
asserted that he faced persecution due to his religious beliefs as a member of a minority sect.
Asif provided evidence of targeted violence and discrimination, describing specific incidents
that highlighted the risks faced by individuals belonging to his community. The IRB carefully
evaluated the applicant's credibility and the broader country conditions regarding religious
freedom.

​

The Board ultimately granted Asif's application for refugee protection, determining that he
could credibly demonstrate a well-founded fear of persecution due to his religious identity. The
IRB recognized that minority sects in Pakistan face systemic violence and repression,
emphasizing the importance of providing refuge to those actionable threats to their safety. This
case reflected the IRB's commitment to upholding human rights and protecting vulnerable
populations.

​

### Turken c Canada (Citoyenneté et Immigration), 2016 CanLII 64004 (CA IRB)

​

In **Turken c. Canada**, the IRB reviewed the refugee claim of an individual from Turkey who
alleged persecution based on their political beliefs and activism against the government. The
claimant provided personal accounts of threats and mistreatment due to their involvement in
opposition activities. The IRB scrutinized both the specifics of the applicant's situation and the
prevailing political landscape in Turkey regarding human rights violations.

​

Ultimately, the Board granted Turken's application for refugee protection, recognizing a
credible fear of persecution based on the evidence presented. The IRB concluded that returning
Turken to Turkey would expose them to significant risks related to their political beliefs. This
decision reflected the IRB’s commitment to protecting individuals at risk due to their activism in
oppressive regimes.

​

### X (Re), 2019 CanLII 127902 (CA IRB)

In **X (Re)**, the IRB considered the refugee application of an individual alleging persecution
based on their sexual orientation in a country known for its pervasive discrimination against
LGBTQ+ individuals. The claimant provided detailed accounts of violence and harassment faced
due to their identity, asserting that returning home would place them at severe risk. The IRB
assessed the individual’s testimony alongside current country conditions related to LGBTQ+
rights.

Ultimately, the Board granted the refugee claim, recognizing a well-founded fear of persecution
based on credible evidence. The IRB underscored the need to protect LGBTQ+ individuals
fleeing oppressive environments, reaffirming Canada’s commitment to safeguarding human
rights and ensuring safety for marginalized communities.

​

### X (Re), 2019 CanLII 127902 (CA IRB)

In **X (Re)**, the IRB considered the refugee application of an individual alleging persecution
based on their sexual orientation in a country known for its pervasive discrimination against
LGBTQ+ individuals. The claimant provided detailed accounts of violence and harassment faced
due to their identity, asserting that returning home would place them at severe risk. The IRB
assessed the individual’s testimony alongside current country conditions related to LGBTQ+
rights.

Ultimately, the Board granted the refugee claim, recognizing a well-founded fear of persecution
based on credible evidence. The IRB underscored the need to protect LGBTQ+ individuals
fleeing oppressive environments, reaffirming Canada’s commitment to safeguarding human
rights and ensuring safety for marginalized communities.

​

​

​

​

​

​

​